No. 7 Ice Train to Frankfurt

And when, in the fields standing like broken teeth, the winter trees, rooted both in sky and earth, having bitten off too much summer, brace against the cold winds to come, I find myself, for the first time feeling the slightest weight of my fifty six years and sensing perhaps the faintest chill of the frost to come.

Our six-to-eight children, clumping here and there for a little while, spread unevenly across the globe from Sydney to Kunming, Melbourne to Frankfurt, like autumn leaves, sheltering from the north wind, provide transient loci for our remaining parental instincts.

We have grandchildren now, very welcome additions, simultaneously strengthening and weakening the bonds and duties of parenthood. Their boisterous new souls snatch the baton from our loosening grasp, thrusting it instead into the innocent, unprepared, hands of our children.

The deed is done, the die is cast, and we are set free to roam the earth like Kami, familial spirits, watching over the living from a distance, available at need, but separate now, distinct once again, from offspring.

It is in a small, zwei zimmer, apartment in Prenzlauer Berg, Berlin, that we plot our escape. It is here, amid the cobbled streets and coffee houses, that we fan the flickering flame of our lives, restoring finally, the saturnine embers, glowing in the dead of night, to full flame, licking at the accumulated detritus of a lifetime, the fuel load, into the beginnings of a raging bush fire that will, god willing, consume and sustain us for thirty years at least.

Germany, grey in late autumn overcast, slips silently by the train window. We are leaving Europe tomorrow. We fly half way around the globe to Sydney, and summer, and perhaps to one last family Christmas and a BBQ on the beach.

Will we gather our brood once more, before the final exodus, or will this be an altogether more modern affair, electronic and instant, implacable as the orange and black display of the Berlin Hauptbahnhof train time table?

One last goodbye in Frankfurt before we board the plane. This has been a good trip, albeit a whirlwind of social encounters. A lifetime of relationships have been honoured or reinstated. It has been, I now see, a kind of clearing of the decks, a profound and sincere act of atonement and preparation – for whatever comes next.

No. 6 The Four Point Method – The downs and ups of starting your own consulting company

The Four Point Method – The downs and ups of starting your own consulting firm

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that any organisation in possession of substantial cash reserves must be in want of a consultant.

However little known the requirements or challenges of Sydney’s leading corporations on first acquaintance, this truth was so well fixed in my mind, that I considered their consulting business to be my rightful province.

This was certainly my assumption a mere twelve months ago when, upon leaving Microsoft after thirteen years, I set up my own Consulting Pty Ltd, a Sydney based consulting firm of the very first water.

I would focus on Cloud Transformation, Corporate Governance, Adoption Change Management, Program Management and Business Analysis. My deep and extensive knowledge and expertise in these areas were, I felt certain, both widely known and fulsomely acknowledged.

I would place a well-formed shingle adjacent to my home-office and wait for the telephone to ring. Or the emails to ping. Or the text messages to arrive. Or at the very least for offers to be pasted on my Facebook wall.

Despite endless endorsements on LinkedIn, frequently from people I don’t know, often for skills I don’t possess, the offers did not flood in. Neither did they flow, nor even trickle.

There was instead a kind of silence – not, sadly, the silence that comes before the storm, not the silence after a deep intake of breath portending imminent action, nor even the silence that punctuates the moment prior to performance of a great work. No. It was the forlorn silence of a deserted office block, in a down-at-heel neighbourhood on a bank holiday weekend.

Surely some mistake? I called my various friends and acquaintances, drew down on my network, and, in all earnestness, sought first to understand.

At last an ex-colleague put to me the crucial question. What, he asked, are you doing about getting work?

Doing? DOING? I was incredulous. I told him about my Facebook page and my LinkedIn profile and my very impressive shingle.

Yes, he said, but what was I actually doing?

‘More than that?’

‘Yes, definitely, more than that.’

‘Errr’.

And then he gave me the following advice which transformed my fortunes within a few weeks, and which I would like to share with you:

(The Four Point Method)

  1. Edit your resumé to cover the specific requirements of each role or contract you apply for. Like you, I thought this sounded like an awful lot of bother and was by no means convinced.
  2. With each application, send a new cover letter addressing the specifics of the role and highlighting your suitability for it. I agree with you – what’s the point of the resumé if you have to say it all again in a cover letter?
  3. If a number (better still the name) of someone to speak to about the role is provided, call it, and call it before you edit your resumé or write your cover letter. No one relishes the opportunity to talk to a recruiter more than I, but actively seeking one out? Really?
  4. Keep constant watch on the job and contract advertising sites and apply for anything interesting the same day it appears. Like I have time to waste browsing job sites!

I thanked my colleague politely and was preparing to hang up, when he asked me if I’d like to know why these four points were important? I couldn’t very well say ‘No’…

  1. Recruitment companies receive so many applications that they have implemented filtering software to reduce the burden of selection. The software parses your resumé looking for the key terms and phrases used in the advertisement. If you use a generic resumé you are unlikely to have covered all these points and you will be filtered out by a machine before any human being has an opportunity to take a look at you.
  2. Recruiters expect a good quality cover letter that explicitly calls out why you are the best person for the job. This saves them time, and time is money.
  3. By calling the recruiter you can make a human connection and become a person rather than a resumé. You can also gain important additional information that the recruiter is happy to provide privately but does not wish to include in the advertisement. By sending in your resumé and cover letter soon after speaking with them, the recruiter can make the connection with you and will probably take the time to read your brilliant writing.
  4. Recruiters work in a highly competitive environment. They need to put their best candidate in front of the client as soon as possible. Same day turn around gives the recruiter, and therefore you, a distinct advantage.

If you follow steps 1 to 4 you make it so much easier to represent you and prioritise your application.

I had to admit, he had a point.

Having previously applied for dozens if not hundreds of contracts, within a couple of weeks of adopting the Four Point Method I had my first few contracts.

Winning contracts, I soon discovered, was only the beginning. But that’s for another time.

For now, a year has passed since I started my own company, and I feel I can say, with a certain minimal authority, the clichés about working for yourself are largely true.

I trust you had a good 2014 and wish you and yours a wonderful and fulfilling 2015.

No. 5 Review of Source by Joseph Jaworski

‘Source’ is the story of Joseph Jaworski’s fifty year pilgrimage through the wilder sides of science and metaphysics, drawn by the promise of the illusive ‘Source’, once experienced viscerally as a very young man, and never forgotten.

Joseph Jaworski (author of ‘Synchronicity’) takes us on his personal odyssey to find the source of human creativity and self-organisation. The journey takes him and us through the realms of physics and philosophy, by way of Eastern religion and Native American shamanism, via metaphysics to a new way of knowing.

Before I go any further I should make it clear that I enjoyed this book and would recommend it, even if many if the ideas expressed required significant suspension of disbelief.

The Source, like the eternal Tao, by its very nature, cannot be defined. But ‘While it cannot be defined, Source can be experienced.’ That is his starting point.  Now then…

The Western scientific-materialist worldview as a belief systems is ‘no longer adequate for the issues our society is facing’ and an historic shift is now occurring leading to a broader, more comprehensive world view.

To achieve the next stage of personal, organisational and human experience we must access our intuition as a valid alternative way of knowing, distinct from and just as good as, scientific reasoning.

Jaworski is interested in developing what he calls ‘Stage IV leaders’ (an extension of Stage III leaders envisioned in Synchronicity) who have this broader world view and are able to access Source.

It seems ‘…there is an underlying intelligence within the universe, which is capable of guiding us and preparing us for the futures we must create.’  ‘We are partners in the evolution of the universe’. By implication, the universe cannot evolve without us.

Jaworski takes us back to the aftermath of a tornado experienced as a very young man. The search and rescue team of which he was a part was, he says, ‘self-organised from the very beginning’. This, for Jaworski, was an expression of Source or what D Bohn calls ‘implicate order’.

That experience triggers his realisation that we have a ‘deep hunger for the experience of oneness…’ coming from working in harmony with the Source, and that ‘…Being used in this way is what it means to be human.’

So far so good, however as his is approach is derived from Taoism, Buddhism and a couple-a-dozen spiritually oriented self-help texts, we really need an explanation – is this a spiritual self-help book or a management book?

It is a little jarring, when Jaworski attempts to lead us back from serene contemplation of the underlying intelligence, to the exploitation of Source for no-nonsense business reasons. The well-spring of the entrepreneurial impulse lies, it seems, in our ability to ‘access the knowledge for action we need at the moment’, which comes from ‘the Source’.

The juxtaposition of the ‘spiritual and metaphysical’, with the ‘no-nonsense scientific business world’ is always a little uncomfortable throughout the book, but Jaworski can perhaps be forgiven for this since his purpose is precisely to bridge the gap in attitudes, world view, culture and meaning between these two worlds and, in the Buddhist phrase, ‘return to the market with helping hands’.

There is a process by which Individuals and teams can learn to ‘sense the way the future wants to unfold, and to enable that unfolding.’ Jaworski quotes Brian Arthur or the Santa Fe Institute: ‘for the day to day work of running a business…scientific decision theory works pretty well. But for “the big decisions in life, you need to reach a deeper region of consciousness” where you can “let an inner wisdom emerge.”  “It take courage to listen to your inner wisdom. But once you hear that wisdom, making a decision becomes fairly easy.”

Arthur describes a ‘knowing’ as coming from the heart where a different set of rules applies. ‘You don’t act out of deduction, you act out of an inner feeling; you’re not even thinking.’ The process resembles the Taoist approach: first ‘observe, observe, observe’, then ‘reflect and retreat’ allowing inner knowledge to emerge, then finally, ‘act swiftly, with a natural flow’. Sounds like a martial art.

Jaworski applies this concept and what he calls the ‘U-Theory’ model – ‘a process by which transformational breakthroughs in any field occur, the creation of knowledge that changes the world as we know it.’ Jaworski applies U-Theory to set up a ‘Lab’ to ‘model the concept of leader as teacher.’

In the Lab, leaders are taught the new capability to ‘sense and actualise emerging futures’. The laboratory provides an environment where these lessons can be applied within U-Theory to “enable entrepreneurial leaders to move through all three stages of observing, … going to that place of deeper knowledge, and enacting…”

I should pause here to tease out two profound ideas dormant in the last few paragraphs: Jaworski believes both 1) that the future wants to unfold in a particular way, and 2) that we humans can sense the way the future  wants to unfold, and act as its midwife.

These ideas are set out and developed over the course of the book without once acknowledging that they fly in the face of what I think most people would see as ‘science’. I suppose all this may be obvious to Jaworski and therefore scarcely need to be laboured over, but I found it distinctly odd, even, from time to time, suspecting subterfuge or sleight of hand.  Jaworski’s position is that modern scientific research across many fields is driving this change in view.

Jaworski sails close to ideas such as ‘intelligent design’, Gaia and a host of ancient superstitions that Western democratic culture since the enlightenment and the advent of the scientific method has fought, and still fights, to eradicate.

It’s not that, individually, many if not all of the ideas martialled or introduced are not reasonable from a certain perspective and within a distinct context, it’s that Jaworski brings together a wide range of controversial, even, in a modern sense ‘heretical’ ideas, and places them on the stage without caveat or comment.

Jaworski refers to Michael Polyani’s concept of ‘indwelling’ which, we are told, can result in sudden illumination or ‘primary knowing’ arising “by means of interconnected wholes… and by means of timeless, direct presentation.”

This is an example of an idea that many of us can, in principle, relate to without unease – we have all experienced sudden intuitions or illuminations which provide a complete answer to a question without the bother of having to apply logic or rational thought. The problem is that many such concepts brought together form a whole which challenges the hegemonistic standpoint of orthodox science.

On his journey of discovery Jaworski has pulled together an eclectic and at first sight potentially incompatible set of practices, from shamanism, qigong, mediation, Taoism, Buddhism to quantum mechanics, and a range of spiritual and other practices such as clairvoyance and telepathy.

Jaworski places great store in encounters with nature, particularly wild animals or majestic weather events because: ‘thousands of years of human evolution are imprinted on our psyche’, ‘spending time alone in nature is at the core of our genetic coding. We are virtually identical to the people who lived at the end of the Ice Age … who possessed capacities that lie dormant in us today, including a heightened sense of awareness and knowing beyond the limited self’.

Jaworski tells of how he underwent a group ‘Sacred Passage’ retreat based on North American shamanistic principles. The retreat required days of prior Taoist awareness training. The group practiced exercises to ‘cultivate universal energy’ based upon the Chinese practice of qigong as well as meditation.

Jaworski believes (after Lievegoed’s ‘Man on the Threshold’) that ‘humanity is experiencing a fundamental change in consciousness. The perceived boundaries that surrounded consciousness for centuries are no longer fixed, and … it is no longer only the physical world that implies reality.’ This change in consciousness enables the fourth stage of leadership.

Stage 1: Self-centric leaders

Stage 2: Achieving Leaders

Stage 3:  Servant Leaders and

Stage IV: Renewing Leaders capable of “breakthrough thinking, strategy formation, operational excellence and innovation.’

To achieve the fourth stage we revisit the Source at its most spiritual, and apparently least materialistic, when ‘encountering the authentic whole’, the ‘energy, or spirit, [that] infuses all living beings … without [which] any organism must fall apart into its constituent elements.’ The source is that ‘… which is truly alive in the living being … this energy or spirit … is never born and never dies.’

Jaworski believes that ‘…Time… moves into the future, attracted by … a destiny state, and that the Source is essentially ‘information’ which, with energy and matter, is one of the foundation processes of the universe.

Jaworski suggests we humans share or have access to a kind of group mind, permeating space and time, which is part of our biological nature.

He then takes us on an unexpected detour into clairvoyance, telepathy, telekinesis and the occult. His conclusion is that thought can directly affect and impact reality: ‘scientific studies irrevocably confirm Bohm’s “unbroken wholeness” of the universe and that we can affect physical outcome through our intention and way of being.’

The Source exists before the sequential order of time, giving birth to the universe at every eternal moment. The Source is the wellspring of the universe itself. To access it we must be open, honest and act only at the right time in the right way. Doors will mysteriously open for us and helping hands appear. “All we have to do is see the oneness that we are.”

Humans can extract information from physical reality “by means that are independent of time and space.” “…information is coming from the future.”

Some aspect of our mind can perceive the future, not infer it or anticipate it “But actually perceive it.”  Furthermore our intelligence is distributed across our bodies, and we have three brains, the mind, the gut and the heart, which are networked together and function below the level of consciousness.

The terminology can get a bit strange, for example, passionately focussed attention attunes your body’s psychophysiological to “a domain of quantum-holographical information, which contains implicit, energetically encoded information about the object” [of attention] which results in an absolute certainty, beyond question or doubt, about the thing yet to happen.

“This experience of an immediate, total sense of the thing as a whole is quite unlike the informational processing experience of normal awareness” These are ‘tiny fragments of the universe embodied in man’, which allow the ‘actualization of potentialities’ in the universe.

“By deliberately changing the internal image of reality, people can change the world. Indeed, the real fundamental changes in societies have come about not from dictates of governments and the results of battles, but through vast numbers of people changing their minds.”

Stage IV leaders experience ‘metanoia’ or sudden illumination which is an ‘invariant law of the universe’ where ‘revelation comes through grace alone’. This ‘transcendence of mind’ or ‘shared intuition’ amounts to a direct knowledge of the underlying logic of the universe or Source. The ‘aha!’ experience ‘just comes [and] when it comes… [it] brings with it certainty’.  “The insight arrives whole… it arrives with a knowing’ that the solution is right – a feeling of its appropriateness, its elegance, its extraordinary simplicity… And it arrives not in the midst of activities or frenzied thoughts, but in moments of stillness.”

The power of love is at the heart of the transformation required of our leaders and our society. ‘A change of meaning is a change of being’.  The path to self-realisation and love is the path to entrepreneurial leadership and knowledge. This leads to ‘the courage to act in an instant’, not to ‘think or strategise’, ‘you just know’.

Jaworski brings the threads together in his four principles and six practices:

Four Principles:

1)      There is an open and emergent quality to the universe.  Order emerges for free in a group of simple components.

2)      The universe is a domain of undivided wholeness; both the material world and consciousness are parts of the same undivided whole. Everything is interconnected and each fragment contains the whole enfolded within in it.

3)       There is a creative Source of infinite potential enfolded in the universe. Connection to this source leads to the emergence of new realities – discovery, creation, renewal and transformation. We are partners in the unfolding universe.

4)      Humans can learn to draw from the infinite potential of the Source by choosing to follow a disciplined path toward self-realization and love, the most powerful energy in the universe.

Six Practices:

1)      Suspend disbelief, or at least suspend knee-jerk habits of thought that close our minds to the possibility of alternative realities – be open.

2)      Use metaphors or mental models to shift our attitude to enable communion with Source -be open ‘receivers’.

3)      Approach the Source from a position of love for mankind and the universe – this enables an “enhanced dialogue with the Source and an increased probability of physical events arising from the Source.”

4)      Avoid attachment to the outcome of the process, choosing instead to “flow” with the indeterminacy itself, “Bring it to reality as it desires”.

5)      Consciousness and The Source, “despite their vast disparity of character and function… are the parents of all reality.”

6)      Inner Self-Management through meditation, qigong and yoga, still the mind and increase access to the Source, creating states of alternate consciousness, tuning channels of reception and amplifying information exchange with the Source.

This approach can be applied to whole organisations: “As the organisation advances and grows, certain core practices begin to define the culture of the enterprise, becoming its “way of being”’

In the closing chapters Jaworski muses on the deepest metaphysical elements of the Source. He reaches beyond the veil of casual human experience into the ‘indestructible and constantly evolving fields of information where all knowledge, wisdom, and unconditional Love are present and available…. In a dimension [outside] our concept of time and space, with non-local and universal interconnectedness. One could call this our Higher consciousness, Divine consciousness, or Cosmic consciousness.”

And then the Epilogue wherein Jaworski ventures into metaphysics way outside the mainstream. The ideas expressed in the epilogue do fall naturally from the conclusions reached in the main body of the book, but some people might find them a little too outré even in a speculative work such as this. The ‘Creationistic’ undertone of some parts of the work is finally made explicit and resolved by means of a kind of universal animistic judo in which it is not God that created the universe, but the universe that created God.

‘Source existed before God; God, the Buddha, Krihsna … all emanated from Source.’

This is a serious work and a good, thought provoking, read. It is probably not for those for whom the scientific method reveals the only valid knowledge.

Source is published by Berrett-Koehler Pulishers, Inc. of San Francisco. Visit: www.bkconnection.com

No. 4 It’s wrong to eat people

I think we can all agree that it’s wrong to eat people. This is rightly one of our strongest taboos.

The word Cannibal is derived from word Caribbee (the Carib people of the Caribbean) corrupted by Spanish to ‘Canibbee’ and thence to the English ‘Cannibal’.  The Carib people practiced a form of ritualistic cannibalism intended to imbue the cannibal with the strengths and powers of the victim. In modern times we use the word more broadly to include the extraction and reuse of spare parts from cars and other equipment and in marketing to mean the sacrificing of one product in order to increase sales of another.

Oddly enough ritualistic cannibalism in symbolic form remains at the heart of the Catholic Church’s ceremony of Holy Communion during which the wine and the wafer are ‘transmogrified’ into the blood and body of Christ – and consumed by the congregation. Perhaps because we know it is not ‘real’, the public ritualistic cannibalism practiced within Catholicism seem to be socially acceptable. If, as was the case in the past, the Catholic Church argued that in the moment of consumption the wine and wafer were genuinely transformed into human tissue – that might engender a different response.

Apart from this peculiar religious exception, Cannibalism – actually to consume the body or body parts of another human being – is a source of universal disgust. Even the case of plane crash survivors who were forced to eat the frozen bodies of their fellow passengers in order to survive, while understandable, fills both us, and the survivors themselves, with loathing.

If, as has been documented, individuals proffer their flesh to be eaten on an entirely voluntary basis, we are still repulsed. It cannot therefore be a question of whether the human flesh is given voluntarily or not. That can’t be it at all. Whether as an act of altruism, compassion, kindness or necessity we just don’t like to see people eating each other.

Why then, when it comes to blood transfusions and organ transplants, do we take the diametrically opposite view?

When it comes to the Red Cross Blood Bank and Transfusion Service we applaud both the donors and the harvesters, and we count the end recipients fortunate indeed at such public spirited behaviour.

When an accident victim is given a blood transfusion they are assimilating material from someone else’s body into themselves. When someone accepts a kidney or a liver they are, for all intents and purposes, doing the very same thing, yet there is no public outcry. We do not think of this as cannibalism.

Blood transfusions and organ transplants are, from this point of view, essentially identical to cannibalism but for some reason they do not trigger the same abhorrence.

We might attempt to tidy all this unpleasantness away by arguing that it is really the act of eating human flesh that is wrong, but there are other factors to take into consideration. Firstly, the purpose of ritualistic cannibalism was, amongst other things, to provide the recipient with the strength and powers of the, albeit unwilling, donor. This sounds remarkably like the expressed purpose of blood transfusions and organ transplants to me.

Further, according the US heart research and stress management organisation, HeartMath, the mind is distributed throughout the whole nervous systems. “The heart and brain maintain a continuous two-way dialogue, each influencing the other’s functioning. The signals the heart sends to the brain can influence perception, emotional processing and higher cognitive functions. This system and circuitry is viewed by neurocardiology researchers as a ‘heart brain’.”

http://www.heartmath.com/about/research-information.html

Furthermore, the human gut itself contains a nexus of over one hundred million neurons (more than the spinal cord) called the ‘enteric nervous systems’ which directly interacts with and affects brain function too.

These facts suggest, certainly in the case of heart transplants, and possibly in relation to other human organs, that the recipient is in effect excising a diseased part of their own distributed mind and replacing it with healthy parts of dead person’s distributed mind.

And it’s not just a matter of some kind of abstract biochemical substrate either, transplants have long been associated with changes in tastes, interests and even musical like and dislikes of the recipients.

In Thomas Fields-Meyer’s article (http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20147267,00.html) he identifies three individuals all of whom reported substantial changes in their tastes and preferences after receiving a transplanted organ and all of whom associated their new preference or taste with that of the organ donor:

  1. Bill Wohl, found himself weeping and rocking to a Sade song having never previously even been aware of her. Later he discovered that the organ donor had been great Sade fan.
  2. Paul Oldham’s donor had been a fourteen year old boy. Paul suddenly found himself developing a taste for chocolate bars having never previously had a sweet tooth.
  3. Jamie Sherman suddenly experienced cravings for Mexican food – his donor had been a lover of cheese enchiladas. Jamie associated his sudden and unexpected bouts of anger post-transplant with the fact that his donor had died in a fight.

There are therefore significant reasons to question our view of organ transplantation as benign and cannibalism as evil. Both cannibalism and organ transplantation share the same purpose and both may share the same unintended consequence of passing on more between ‘donor’ and recipient than was intended or has previously been widely understood.

Comments welcomed: Poppy

No. 3 Free Money

The year is racing ahead without so much as a ‘by your leave’ and already the Catholic Pope has resigned in a vacuum of rumour, backbiting and accusation, whilst here in Australia the fire, flood and pestilence season has gotten off to a great start. The country divided with pleasing symmetry into the flooded North and the burning South.

The Japanese, in the spirit of Total Quality Management (TQA) are continuing their record breaking free money stint. The official interest rate alternates between nothing and ‘we’ll pay you take the stuff away’.

But it’s not just the Japanese who can’t think of anything productive to do with their money, it’s quite a widespread problem. That giant corporations can amass tens of billions of dollars in cash deposits and have not the faintest clue how to make productive use of these war chests, in my view, beggars belief. There are many micro-lending organisations across Asia, Africa, Central and South America that could no doubt put this money, hoovered up from across the globe, to good use.

Perhaps those who have buckets of cash and no idea what to do with it should hand it over to the entrepreneurial masses whom, one may be certain, would come up with something.

Meanwhile, here in Punchbowl the new ‘Plazza’ town centre shopping and accommodation complex, powered by Woolworth’s vision of urban perfection, is beginning to take shape with the shopping precinct opening in December.

But wait! A sobering dash of ice cold water has cast a long shadow over this otherwise idyllic hamlet; the shortage of barbers (a mere dozen within a 300 metre radius of Punchbowl railway station), is beginning to impinge upon our feel-good-factor.

Elsewhere, the Americans have retreated into their arcane national sport of tormenting people who have done something ‘inappropriate’. To do or say something not in keeping with the prissy social mores of the American elite, or at least with the social mores imagined by the American circus to be those of the elite, brings swift and immediate opprobrium, followed, inevitably, by death. The latest victims of this sport include various candidates for Barrack Obama’s cabinet.

The upside of this is that, for the time being, they are not trying quite so hard to be the saviours of Western Civilisation. On the downside, it is just a matter of time before they switch their attention from bating their internal political opponents and return once more to destabilising the world.

The current rampage and destruction of world cultural heritage by disposed mercenaries across North Africa was precipitated at least in part by the West’s unfortunate predisposition towards unseating dictators (Iraq, Libya, Egypt and now Syria) apparently without any thought as to the consequences. World News from Punchbowl (WNFP) has uncovered the amusing practice whereby the out-going American President hands a note to the in-coming President containing the name of the dictator he, or potentially she, is expected to topple. It’s a sort of a presidential game and failure to oust ‘your’ dictator is considered very bad form.

It is a matter of no small national pride here in the ‘lucky country’, that our practice of suckling at the breast of American democracy has enabled us not just to emulate our American mentors, but, in terms of banality and viciousness of national politics, to exceed them by a substantial margin. Our upcoming federal election promises to offer an exemplary display case for our new found skills.  Perhaps we should make it a display sport at the next Olympics?

But all is not sunshine and barbeques – right here in Punchbowl’s back yard, the Chinese, Japanese and Russians are back to squaring up against each other over a variety of barren rocky islands which are said to be strategic, or which might possibly sit over mineral deposits or good fishing grounds, or just ‘because’.

Those interested in sending a high-level negotiating team to break the deadlock should write to the editor or leave your name at the post office on The Boulevard (across from the medical centre).

Talking of Russia and the possible total destruction of life on earth; was it just me, or did it seem strange to you that there was nothing but a deafening silence from the astronomical community after a giant meteorite exploded spectacularly over Chelyabinsk in Russia? Had they not that very same night congratulated themselves and reassured us that an even bigger asteroid was going to miss the earth by a hair’s breadth? How come they failed to spot the Russian one, and how many others did they miss that night? The residents of Punchbowl demand to know!

For our readers with an interest in New Zealand, WNFP can report that New Zealand remains a stable, sensible, well run, reasonably open minded and pleasant country.

Our next edition may carry an in depth analysis of the global horse meat scandal threatening the pallets of discerning processed meat eaters and equestrophiles the world over. Or we may cover something more interesting.  Stay Tuned!

Poppy

No. 2 The End Of The World

The year 2012 is drawing inexorably to its close and the Mayans have failed in their inadvertent bid to end the world. So far so good.

In a world dominated by talk of climate change, population explosion and sustainability, I want to highlight a few positive counter processes that put such undeniable woes in a broader context. These are, permanently low interest rates, the emerging superabundance of goods and services, population collapse in the advanced industrialised countries, downward pressure on populations in the rest of the world.

Apart from the usual rag-tag-and-bob-tail of fundamentalists, religious and otherwise, for whom sin and retribution in a thousand different forms is an article of faith, there remain the great unwashed masses of humanity for whom climate change, sustainability and population explosion have ascended the throne of moral imperatives.

These are the commandments at the heart of our new covenant with nature.

With sin and retribution safely out of the way we must now grovel before the altar of the scientific method and, if decent manners and polite society are to be preserved at all, sacrifice ourselves upon it.

There is now one and only one acceptable way of thinking, one and only one allowable logic. To believe otherwise is regarded, at best, as simpleminded and at worst as heresy.

In my first blog I mentioned that sea levels are approximately in the middle of their 120 metre range, and could rise or fall, as they have in the past, by around 60 metres. The climate change lobby does not contemplate more than a very tiny proportional change in sea levels over the coming century and says that the expected tiny change is both man made and recoverable.

On the upside, we may be entering a period of permanently low interest rates. Some countries, such as Japan, have been enjoying, or living with, an effective zero official bank rate for over a decade. Australia is heading towards a decade of low interest rates, and the USA and Europe are likewise experiencing low interest rates. Demand for money, for capital, seems to be at an all-time low. That is why its price, the interest rate, is so low.

In the advanced, industrialised countries all around the world, native population numbers are falling as people have children later in life and have fewer children. Where populations are growing in these countries, the increase is largely due to immigration. This is so starkly evident in Japan, that the country’s legislature is becoming alarmed that Japan’s culture may be diluted by foreigners.

In the two countries contributing most to global population increase and to global pollution, China and India, there is evidence that population growth may begin to tail off and may even stop in the next few decades.

This is more evident in China currently than in India, but the causes are the same.  Firstly huge numbers of people are leaving the rural areas and moving to the cities as these countries become more industrialised. If mum and dad are both working long hours to make ends meet, and the kids’ education has to be paid for privately, there is a natural downward pressure on population growth.

Secondly, in both countries there is a large and growing middle class and the middle class is becoming a powerful force for change.

The Russian born, but naturalised American economist, Kuznets, developed the so-called Kuznets curve that describes a trade-off between, variously: industrialisation and flow of population to the cities, increasing city populations and growing middle class and a growing middle class and decreasing environmental pollution.

Right now China and India, amongst the most polluted countries on earth, are experiencing the largest growth in the middle class and the largest shift in employment to the towns from the country. The stage may be set for these emerging middles classes to do their stuff.

There is a second, equally interesting phenomenon emerging all over the world but most strikingly in China and India, and that is superabundance of goods and services.

We saw superabundance in digital form with the emergence of the World Wide Web some twenty or so years ago. Digital recordings of music, books and movies are, in effect, superabundant as they can be copied almost infinitely at minimal cost.

This superabundance is now beginning to emerge in manufactured goods and in services, led by China.

China plans to create two hundred new cities along its Pacific coast. Each of these cities would become a centre for some specialised form of production.  The most famous of these is the popularly named ‘Sock City’ Datang that produces 9 billion socks per year or around 60% of all socks purchased in the industrialised West.

Near to Datang is the ‘Button Capital’ of world, Qiaotou which likewise dominates the global button market.

In the current economic uncertainty China’s plan has been slowed, but we may yet see emerging ‘Jumper’ and ‘Trouser’ cities.

The effect of this is to produce these items in such abundance that their wholesale price per unit becomes increasingly low, tending towards, but never quite reaching, zero.

Consider that in 1909 the USA was still pretty much at the horse and buggy stage, and that a mere sixty years later they put men on the moon.

In Asia, if we look at the meteoric rise of Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand between 1965 and 1995 and of the Shanghai region of China in less than a decade, it is evident that the shift from large rural population engaging in agriculture to large urban population engaging in manufacturing and services, can now be achieved in a few short years.

Evolutionary stages that we might have once believed mandatory can now be leap-frogged with the latest technology and know-how. In India the HP Company will build a gas powered electricity generation plant next to a new Data or Call Centre so that the very latest technology can be used.

If the population of the industrialised countries is shrinking, and that of the rest of the world may be levelling out, and if superabundance continues to spread, sector by sector, we may one day see a sustainable future driven at this stage by capitalism itself.

Who knew?

Oddly enough it was Karl Marx’s view that superabundance would be achieved under a capitalist economic system and that it would pave the way for communism. Watch this space…

Poppy

No. 1 Punchbowl

Punchbowl, if by chance you may not know it, is a suburb ten miles south west of the Sydney Opera House and Harbour Bridge.

It is also, according to Einstein’s thesis on ‘the observer’, and given the fact that the rest of the universe is moving away equally in all directions, the centre of the universe.

This makes it a splendid spot from which to comment on the various matters and goings-on that concern mankind.

We need a baseline. We should begin by summarising where we are now.
A Bit of History
The great empires of the last few hundred years, the Spanish and Portuguese and later the French and British, have passed into distant memory.

Their scars are fewer than before and their taste while still occasionally thickening the tongue, has become less bitter.

The American Empire has, with a massive explosion of creativity, innovation, energy and self-righteousness, shattered the old world and raped the new.

Whatever one’s point of view, such an empire could not burn so fast and so very hot, without at last succumbing to the collapsing vortex of its own expenditure and consumption.

America has gone broke, its power is waning and the old-new powers of the Pacific and Indian Oceans are edging out of the wings.

A Bit of Geopolitics
China and India are growing in confidence and vision.

This year, the Year of the Dragon, China for the first time, and in an unambiguous, if subtle, statement of intent, published a series of postage stamps bearing the Imperial Chinese Dragon, rampant, facing outward at the rest of the world, claws raised to strike, fangs snarling – at us.

The ferocious image caused a stir in China, but passed all but un-noticed in the West; too subtle perhaps. (See http://news.yahoo.com/chinas-dragon-stamp-breathes-criticism-fear-100045118.html)

The stamp’s designer, Chen Shaohua, is quoted as saying the image is symbolic of China’s mounting confidence.

Yahoo quotes his blog saying “As a large country which has major influence in the world, China is ushering in the restoration of national confidence.”

“From sternness and divinity, to a representation of China’s self-confidence, a dragon which is tough, powerful, stern and confident is an appropriate choice”.

Powerful, stern, confident and tough – please take note.

India, a step or two behind China and a little smaller geographically and in terms of population, is also beginning to flex its geopolitical muscles.

A recent spate of attacks on Indian students in Australia sparked a strong and confident response from the Indian government.

India is now less concerned about Europe, American or even tiny Australia, and instead is fixing its eye on its local rival, China.

China provides India with a camouflaged umbrella under which it can hide, for the time being.

While all eyes are on an increasingly strident China, India is putting its house in order and growing politically, militarily and economically.

This is the broad, highly simplified context in which various hanger-on states (Australia and Israel come to mind) are hurriedly repositioning themselves in an attempt to chart a safe course between Atlantic and Indo-Pacific rivals.

For Australia it means attempting to utilise its new found observer status on the UN Security Council without annoying America or China too much. One might wonder why they wanted the Security Council observer seat in the first place.

For Israel, in the aftermath of its failed attempt to re-occupy Gaza after the Palestinian state was given UN Observer status, it means gauging how long they can depend upon America to protect them in the face of growing Arab and particularly Hamas political and military confidence.

Some pundits have suggested that building in the zone known as E1 would effectively preclude a two-nation settlement between Israel and the Palestinians as it closes the potential Arab corridor to Jerusalem.

If that is so, and Israel does build in E1, the dice may have been cast and ultimately only Palestine or Israel will survive.

A Bit of Economics
Economically the world has suffered a terrible catastrophe in the form of the Global Financial Crisis and is only now beginning to come to terms with the sovereign debt crisis that Keynesian economic stimulus engendered.

America, as appears to have become its habit, is prancing theatrically towards its very own fiscal cliff.

Some economists and banking types have begun to suggest that the sovereign debt crisis might be settling down and Greece, followed by the rest of the Mediterranean countries, would not have to default on its debt and leave the Euro zone, precipitating the world once more into economic and financial chaos.

A Bit of Science
The climate too is misbehaving. More and more evidence is accumulating that climate change is real and that the effects will be significant and unpredictable.

There appears to be no evidence at all that change, when it comes, will happen in a polite, linear manner, i.e. that an ‘x’ per cent increase in global temperature will lead to a ‘y’ per cent increase in sea levels, or anything else.

There is plenty of incontrovertible evidence that temperatures and sea level have in the past been both very much higher and very much lower.

On the lower side, sits the fact that several cities lie approximately 200 feet under water off the coast of India.

This became known when fishermen complained of catching their nets in roof tiles and other submerged structures.

If one accepts the assumption that these cities were not built underwater in the first place, then either the land level has gone down or sea level has gone up two hundred feet since they were built. I am assuming the latter.

At the same time, it is known that the 200 feet tall cliffs of the Great Australian Bite were once under water.

So taken together it seems that sea level has a range of at least 400 feet or approximately 120 metres.

A Little Bit of Medicine
In terms of global health it appears that smallpox, polio and malaria either have been or will probably soon be wiped out and at the same time we have bred several penicillin resistant diseases (what the newspapers call ‘super bugs’) most notable of which is probably tuberculosis, that we may no longer be able to cure.

So What?
So where does that leave us? It is my belief that we are on the cusp of major change. Everyone I speak to about it has this feeling that something major is about to change, and to change fundamentally.

This blog, which I hope to update at least monthly, will examine some of the major (and some of the minor) political, economic, social and techno-scientific issues and developments of our times.

This is all my opinion, and you are welcome to comment.

This is post No.1, December 2012.

See you in January 2001, Poppy.